HR & Recruiting

AI screens the pile, your team makes the hire

Resume screening, shortlisting, voice interview scoring, and job-lead sourcing — automated end to end, with a human recruiter on every final decision.

  • Human-led decisions
  • Consistent scoring
  • ATS-integrated
  • Full audit trail

What we build

4 commitments, 1 senior bench.

Every recruiting and internal-ops build ships against the same four constraints — no exceptions for demos or deadlines.

01

Humans make the hire

AI screens, shortlists, and scores against a rubric. The offer, the rejection, and every final call stays with a named recruiter.

Proof layer Approval gates on every decision step, logged and reviewable.

02

ATS-native, not bolted on

We build on top of the ATS and calendar stack you already run — scoped in a readiness sprint against your exact setup.

Proof layer Integration scoped and tested against your sandbox, not a mock.

03

One rubric for every candidate

Voice interviews ask the same structured questions and score against the same standardized rubric — no rushed panels, no gut-feel gaps.

Proof layer Transcripts and scores reviewable per candidate, per question.

04

Senior engineers, weekly demos

A named senior lead owns the outcome. You see working software weekly, not a status deck monthly.

Proof layer Senior review on every merge; 30-day exit on embedded pods.

Integration reality
ATS platforms Calendar and interview scheduling Voice and interview infrastructure The reporting layer
Where it pays back

The bottleneck patterns we see in every hiring team.

  1. Workflow · 01

    Resume screening is the bottleneck

    Every requisition sits behind a recruiter manually reading a stack of applications before anyone gets a call.

    AI screening and shortlisting with a human approval gate

  2. Workflow · 02

    First-round interviews are inconsistent

    One candidate gets a tough panel, another gets a rushed 15 minutes — the rubric lives in someone’s head.

    A voice interview agent scoring every candidate against the same rubric

  3. Workflow · 03

    Job-lead sourcing is manual scrolling

    Someone spends hours a week scanning listings and copying leads into a spreadsheet.

    Automated sourcing with status tracking and CRM sync

Use cases

Where HR and ops teams put us to work.

Eight workflows where automation pays back first — each scoped, evaluated, and gated by a human before it touches a hiring decision.

  • Resume screening & shortlisting

    Every application parsed, scored against the requisition, and shortlisted — with a human approval gate before outreach.

    Teams buried in applicant piles
  • Voice interview screening

    A voice agent runs structured first-round interviews and scores every candidate against the same rubric.

    High-volume first rounds
  • Job-lead sourcing

    Listings scraped, deduplicated, and scored across boards — synced to your CRM with status tracking.

    Agencies sourcing by hand
  • Interview scheduling

    Slot booking, reschedules, and reminders wired into recruiter and panel calendars — no email ping-pong.

    Coordinators drowning in threads
  • Onboarding workflows

    Offer-to-day-one checklists — accounts, equipment, paperwork, and intro sequences triggered automatically.

    Ops teams onboarding weekly
  • Internal HR help desk

    Policy, benefits, and PTO questions answered from your own documents — sensitive cases route to a person.

    HR teams answering the same 20 questions
  • Approvals & requests

    Leave, expense, and access requests routed to the right approver with escalation and a full audit trail.

    Approvals stuck in inboxes
  • Recruiting ops reporting

    Pipeline volume, time-to-shortlist, and source performance on one dashboard your hiring leads actually open.

    Leaders flying blind on the funnel

Case studies

Proven solutions. Real-world impact.

How our teams solve recruiting and internal-operations problems through strategy, engineering, and innovation.

FAQ

The questions hiring leads ask first.

Straight answers before the first call. If yours is not here, ask it on the call — we answer the hard ones first.

Ask the hard one

Does the AI make the hiring decision?

No. It screens, shortlists, and scores against a rubric. A human recruiter makes every final call.

Does this replace our ATS?

No, it integrates with the ATS you already run — we build on top of it, not around it.

How is interview scoring kept consistent?

Every candidate is asked the same structured questions and scored against the same standardized rubric, whether the interview is live or voice-automated.

Who sees candidate data during the build?

We scope against synthetic or anonymized data wherever possible. Any access to real candidate data is limited to named engineers, logged, and documented in a data-flow map you keep.

What happens when the AI is unsure about a candidate?

Borderline scores never get auto-rejected. Anything below a confidence threshold routes to a recruiter for manual review, with the transcript and scoring rationale attached.

Start the conversation

Keeptherecruiteronthedecision,
automate the screening

Tell us which part of your hiring pipeline eats the most hours. We will tell you what we can automate today and what stays with your team.

30 minutes the engineer who leads delivery no deck, no pitch