Services · GenAI, LLM & RAG solutions

Answers grounded in your documents , with citations

A chat box is not a strategy. We build retrieval-augmented systems that answer from your private knowledge, cite the source, and respect who is allowed to see what.

Retrieval-grounded Citations on every answer Access-controlled
A single page lifted from a stack of navy documents, a cyan beam tracing the retrieved passage to its source
Built with
pgvector Pinecone OpenAI Anthropic LangChain Postgres
Where it hurts · what we build

The value is in retrieval and guardrails, not the model.

RAG over private docs
Operational automation
The pain

Highly paid staff spend hours searching scattered PDFs and fragmented knowledge bases.

What we build

A system that retrieves the exact paragraph from internal archives and answers with source citations.

Read the case study
Internal copilots
Operational automation
The pain

New staff lack institutional knowledge and need constant peer support to do the work.

What we build

An always-available assistant that guides employees through specific standard operating procedures.

Read the case study
Structured extraction
Operational automation
The pain

Pulling clauses or figures from thousands of unstructured contracts is slow manual labor.

What we build

Software that scans unstructured text, extracts the entities, and populates a queryable database.

Read the case study
One retrieval pipeline

Every answer traces back to the exact source passage .

For teams replacing open-ended chat with grounded, auditable retrieval over private knowledge.

A query runs against embeddings in a vector store , the most relevant passages are retrieved under access controls, and the model synthesizes an answer with citations pinned to each fact. Nothing is invented, and every claim links back to a document.

Connects to pgvectorPineconeLangChainPostgres
A RAG pipeline: a query at the center surrounded by document tiles, flowing to an embeddings and vector store node, then a retrieve step, then an access-controlled answer with citations
Query to grounded answer, with citations
Where the sector is heading
Production accuracy · 2026
61 %

Multi-model verification cuts hallucination

Verification architectures drop enterprise error rates from 8.3 percent to 3.2 percent in production.

Source: natlawreview.com, 2026
Retrieval quality · 2026
20–40 %

Hybrid retrieval beats vector-only

Combining dense embeddings with keyword matching raises recall, forcing teams past basic vector search.

Source: FloTorch, 2026
Operating cost · 2026
$8.1k+ /mo

Cost forces real optimization

Enterprise RAG runs $8,100 to $19,500 a month, so embedding and inference costs must be tuned.

Source: Stratagem Systems, 2026
The cost of standing still

What unverified GenAI and manual search cost.

A chat box looks productive in a pilot demo. Then hallucinated answers, manual document hunts, and per-output correction costs erode the time savings the rollout promised. That retrieval and guardrail layer is where most GenAI programs stall—and where cited, access-controlled answers earn their place.

$67.4 B

Global business losses attributed to AI hallucinations in 2024

Suprmind, 2026

$235

Average cost to correct a single hallucinated output in legal processing

natlawreview.com, 2026

$118

Average correction cost per hallucinated output in financial services

natlawreview.com, 2026

4,150

Manual corrections per month at an 8.3 percent error rate on 50,000 documents

natlawreview.com, 2026

What we build

What every retrieval build ships with.

01

Retrieval grounding

The model synthesizes only from the exact documents retrieved, with clickable source citations.

02

Guardrails & evals

Output guardrails and evaluation frameworks measure hallucination control, not vibes.

03

Access control

The retrieval layer inherits your directory permissions, so users see only what they may.

04

Cost routing

Small, fast models handle routing; heavy models are reserved for complex synthesis.

For U.S. SLED prime contractors

Records search and constituent Q&A, behind the prime.

For SLED scope under NAICS 511210, we index public records and 311 knowledge bases and answer constituent queries as your subcontractor, never facing the agency.

NAICS 511210 541512 518210
See SLED Subcontracting

NDA-first, subcontract-only. We work behind the prime, under your brand. We do not pursue prime contracts and we never face the agency.

Data stays yours. Private API endpoints and zero-retention agreements mean your data never trains a public model.

Deployed in your VPC. Models run inside a secure virtual private cloud with role-based access at the retrieval layer.

FAQ

GenAI and RAG, answered.

Will our private corporate data be used to train public models?

No. We use private API endpoints and zero-retention agreements so your data never leaves your controlled environment.

How do you prevent the system from inventing facts?

Strict retrieval grounding and multi-model verification mean the model can only synthesize answers from the exact documents provided to it.

How do we control who sees what internal information?

The retrieval engine inherits your existing active directory permissions, so users only retrieve documents they are authorized to view.

What drives the ongoing operational cost?

Query volume and token usage. We optimize by using smaller, faster models for routing and reserving heavy models for complex synthesis.

How is this different from an AI agent?

This is the retrieval and LLM-application layer, the part that grounds answers in your documents. Agents add orchestration and tool use on top of it.

Start the conversation

Stop searching. Start retrieving

Tell us where your team loses hours hunting through documents. That is where the first index goes.

Scope a RAG build