Digital portals and course materials violate new federal accessibility mandates.
An interface rebuild that meets WCAG 2.1 AA color, contrast, and navigation standards.
70% of internal software fails on adoption, not code. And by 2027, SLED digital services must meet WCAG 2.1 AA. We design accessible, intuitive interfaces and the design systems that keep them consistent.
Digital portals and course materials violate new federal accessibility mandates.
An interface rebuild that meets WCAG 2.1 AA color, contrast, and navigation standards.
Complex internal software fails because employees refuse to use frustrating tools.
A unified design system that cuts training time and friction with consistent, intuitive interfaces.
Acquisition spend is wasted when checkout or search friction causes abandonment.
Conversion-optimized interfaces that guide users from discovery to purchase.
Wireframe to an accessible, shipped system .
We move from low-fidelity flows to a WCAG 2.1 AA component library : research real tasks, design the system, build it in code, then measure adoption and task success, not just sign-off.
State and local digital services for populations over 50,000 must conform by April 2027, with smaller districts in 2028.
Enterprise software fails not because the code breaks but because poor usability blocks employee adoption.
AI is overhyped for layout generation but effective for contrast testing, alt-text, and semantic structure.
Frustrating interfaces and inaccessible portals do not just annoy users—they block adoption, waste training budgets, and invite compliance risk. These figures describe the UX and accessibility landscape, not Techtiz engagements—and what poor usability and inaccessibility cost.
Of internal software implementations fail on poor adoption
MeltingSpot, 2026
Of employees face daily frustration with clunky workplace tech
MeltingSpot, 2026
Of employees stop using tech they find hard to navigate
MeltingSpot, 2026
Until large SLED entities face litigation risk on ADA accessibility
Coates' Canons, 2026
WCAG 2.1 AA color, contrast, keyboard navigation, and screen-reader support built in, not retrofitted.
A centralized component library that keeps every screen consistent and cuts build time.
Structural, semantic fixes for legacy portals, not unreliable automated overlay plugins.
Task completion, support deflection, and conversion tracked before and after.
Two builds where the work was in the parts that do not demo.
Why it is relevant: a product where clarity and trust in the interface were the point, the same discipline accessible design demands.
Why it is relevant: a consumer product whose adoption depended on a frictionless flow across web and mobile.
If your SLED scope includes accessibility compliance for public portals, we do the remediation behind the prime. The boundary is fixed on purpose.
NDA-first, subcontract-only. We work behind the prime, under your brand. We do not pursue prime contracts and we never face the agency.
Verifiable compliance. Structural WCAG 2.1 AA remediation with past-performance evidence, not automated overlays the DOJ has flagged as unreliable.
Capability over claims. Design systems, component libraries, and accessibility audits mapped to your bid's scope.
If you operate in SLED or receive federal funding, yes. ADA Title II requires WCAG 2.1 AA compliance by 2027 or 2028 depending on your population size.
No. The Department of Justice has noted automated remediation tools are unreliable. True compliance requires structural, semantic code updates.
Because 70% of software implementations fail on poor adoption. An intuitive interface ensures your expensive software investment is actually used.
We track specific metrics before and after, including task completion speed, reduction in support tickets, and increased conversion rates.
Tell us which interface is being avoided or failing audit. We will tell you what to fix first.
Scope a design engagement